Danielsaurus

‘It’s Not What We Teach’

I was recently reminded of this wonderful essay by the ever-cogent Alfie Kohn, and I think it says it all beautifully – about every part of how we approach children, not just education:

I never understood all the fuss about that old riddle – “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear, does it still make a sound?” Isn’t it just a question of how we choose to define the word sound? If we mean “vibrations of a certain frequency transmitted through the air,” then the answer is yes. If we mean “vibrations that stimulate an organism’s auditory system,” then the answer is no.

More challenging, perhaps, is the following conundrum sometimes attributed to defiant educators: “I taught a good lesson even though the students didn’t learn it.” Again, everything turns on definition. If teaching is conceived as an interactive activity, a process of facilitating learning, then the sentence is incoherent. It makes no more sense than “I had a big dinner even though I didn’t eat anything.” But what if teaching is defined solely in terms of what the teacher says and does? In that case, the statement isn’t oxymoronic – it’s just moronic. Wouldn’t an unsuccessful lesson lead whoever taught it to ask, “So what could I have done that might have been more successful?”

That question would indeed occur to educators who regard learning – as opposed to just teaching – as the point of what they do for a living. More generally, they’re apt to realize that what we do doesn’t matter nearly as much as how kids experience what we do.

To be honest – and to indulge in a bit of selfish reflection – I think this is the common thing, the feeling that has attracted me professionally and personally to both storytelling and education (in the Alfie Kohn sense). It’s all about sharing experiences. Later on, Kohn writes about how the experiences of teachers matters, too, and I think it’s a fitting conclusion:

Finally, as teachers are to students, so administrators are to teachers. Successful school leadership doesn’t depend on what principals and superintendents do, but on how their actions are regarded by their audience – notably, classroom teachers. Those on the receiving end may be older, but the moral is the same: It’s best to see what we do through the eyes of those to whom it’s done.

And I think that’s the crux of it. That’s the crux of everything in life: “It’s best to see what we do through the eyes of those to whom it’s done.”